Eritrea vs Poland: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Poland
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
84th
Poland rank
84th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Poland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Poland, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 84th and Poland ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Poland?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Poland as of 2011.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Poland?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Poland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Poland rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 84th and Poland ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.