Mauritius vs Rwanda: Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Mauritius
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
84th
Rwanda rank
84th
Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Mauritius
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 84th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Rwanda?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for other forest — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Mauritius ranks 84th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other forest — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.