Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Ecuador: Per capita co2 by source
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
0
in 2011
Ecuador
0
in 1960
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
141st
Ecuador rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0 against 0 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Ecuador?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0 against 0 in Ecuador as of 2011.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Ecuador?
- 0, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Ecuador?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Ecuador rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.