Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Greenland: Per capita co2 by source
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
0
in 2011
Greenland
0
in 1988
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
- Greenland
How they compare
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 0 against 0 in Greenland, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 3.16 | 3.16 | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 | 2.87 | 2.87 | Greenland |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.5447 | 0.5447 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0397 | 0.0397 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Greenland?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 0 against 0 in Greenland as of 2011.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Greenland?
- 0, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Greenland?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1988.
- How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Greenland rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.