Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Malta: Per capita co2 by source

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
0
in 2011
Malta
0
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
141st
Malta rank
138th

Per capita co2 by source over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Malta
00.511.52195019872024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 against 0 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Malta ranks 138th of 179 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Malta Difference Ahead
1950s 0 0.1013 0.1013 Malta
1960s 0 0.0201 0.0201 Malta
1970s 0 0.0033 0.0033 Malta
1980s 0 0.8206 0.8206 Malta
1990s 0 0.8232 0.8232 Malta
2000s 0 0.0001 0.0001 Malta
2010s 0 0.0001 0.0001 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Malta?
Malta, at 0 against 0 in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Malta?
0, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Malta?
62 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2011.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Malta rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 141st and Malta ranks 138th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Per capita co2 by source
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 17,915 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed