Congo vs Faroe Islands: Per capita CO₂ emissions by source
Congo
0 tonnes per person
in 1958
Faroe Islands
0 tonnes per person
in 1989
Congo rank
141st
Faroe Islands rank
141st
Per capita CO₂ emissions by source over time
- Congo
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0 tonnes per person.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 141st and Faroe Islands ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions by source, Congo or Faroe Islands?
- Congo, at 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Faroe Islands as of 1958.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions by source between Congo and Faroe Islands?
- 0 tonnes per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Faroe Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1958.
- How do Congo and Faroe Islands rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions by source?
- Congo ranks 141st and Faroe Islands ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes per person.