Congo vs Libya: Per capita co2 by source

Congo
0
in 1958
Libya
0
in 2008
Congo rank
141st
Libya rank
141st

Per capita co2 by source over time

  • Congo
  • Libya
00.050.10.15195019792008

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Libya ahead.

Congo ranks 141st and Libya ranks 141st of 179 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Congo or Libya?
Congo, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 1958.
What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Congo and Libya?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Libya?
9 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1958.
How do Congo and Libya rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
Congo ranks 141st and Libya ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Libya: Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid, drawing on Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-co2-by-source/congo-rep/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-co2-by-source/congo-rep/libya/">Congo vs Libya: Per capita co2 by source</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita co2 by source
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 17,915 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed