Curacao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Per capita co2 by source
Curacao
0
in 2011
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0
in 1980
Curacao rank
141st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Curacao
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 against 0 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 141st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 141st of 178 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0.0237 | 0.0237 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Curacao or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Curacao, at 0 against 0 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2011.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1980.
- How do Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Curacao ranks 141st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 141st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.