Ecuador vs Greenland: Per capita co2 by source
Ecuador
0
in 1960
Greenland
0
in 1988
Ecuador rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Ecuador
- Greenland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in Greenland, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0001 | 3.16 | 3.16 | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 | 3.76 | 3.76 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Ecuador or Greenland?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in Greenland as of 1960.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Ecuador and Greenland?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and Greenland rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.