Ecuador vs South Sudan: Per capita CO₂ emissions by source
Ecuador
0 tonnes per person
in 1960
South Sudan
0 tonnes per person
in 2011
Ecuador rank
141st
South Sudan rank
141st
Per capita CO₂ emissions by source over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 tonnes per person.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0001 tonnes per person | 0.0034 tonnes per person | 0.0033 tonnes per person | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes per person | 0.0009 tonnes per person | 0.0009 tonnes per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions by source, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in South Sudan as of 1960.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions by source between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0 tonnes per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions by source?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes per person.