Ecuador vs Tunisia: Per capita co2 by source
Ecuador
0
in 1960
Tunisia
0
in 2012
Ecuador rank
141st
Tunisia rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Ecuador
- Tunisia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.017 | 0.0117 | 0.0053 | Ecuador |
| 1920s | 0.0066 | 0.0109 | 0.0043 | Tunisia |
| 1930s | 0.0002 | 0.0011 | 0.0009 | Tunisia |
| 1940s | 0.0002 | 0.0213 | 0.0211 | Tunisia |
| 1950s | 0.0001 | 0.067 | 0.067 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.0267 | 0.0267 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Ecuador or Tunisia?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in Tunisia as of 1960.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.