Malta vs Suriname: Per capita co2 by source
Malta
0
in 2024
Suriname
0
in 2009
Malta rank
138th
Suriname rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Malta
- Suriname
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 against 0 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 138th and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.1013 | 0.0139 | 0.0874 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.0201 | 0.0775 | 0.0573 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.0033 | 0.216 | 0.2127 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.2622 | 0.1283 | 0.134 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.0001 | 0 | 0.0001 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Malta or Suriname?
- Malta, at 0 against 0 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Malta and Suriname?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Suriname?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2009.
- How do Malta and Suriname rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Malta ranks 138th and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.