Malta vs Tunisia: Per capita co2 by source
Malta
0
in 2024
Tunisia
0
in 2012
Malta rank
138th
Tunisia rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Malta
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 against 0 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 138th and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.1013 | 0.067 | 0.0342 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.0201 | 0.0405 | 0.0203 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.0033 | 0.0558 | 0.0525 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.8206 | 0.0353 | 0.7854 | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.8232 | 0.0289 | 0.7942 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.0001 | 0.0206 | 0.0205 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 | 0.0029 | 0.0029 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Malta or Tunisia?
- Malta, at 0 against 0 in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Malta and Tunisia?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tunisia?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2012.
- How do Malta and Tunisia rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Malta ranks 138th and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.