Suriname vs Tunisia: Per capita co2 by source
Suriname
0
in 2009
Tunisia
0
in 2012
Suriname rank
141st
Tunisia rank
141st
Per capita co2 by source over time
- Suriname
- Tunisia
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 against 0 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Tunisia ahead.
Suriname ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0139 | 0.067 | 0.0531 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 0.0775 | 0.0405 | 0.037 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.216 | 0.0558 | 0.1602 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.1283 | 0.0363 | 0.092 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.0139 | 0.0139 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 by source, Suriname or Tunisia?
- Suriname, at 0 against 0 in Tunisia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 by source between Suriname and Tunisia?
- 0, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tunisia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2003.
- How do Suriname and Tunisia rank globally for per capita co2 by source?
- Suriname ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.