Aruba vs South Sudan: Per capita co2 coal
Aruba
0
in 1985
South Sudan
0
in 2011
Aruba rank
141st
South Sudan rank
141st
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Aruba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 against 0 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
Across all 36 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0.0034 | 0.0034 | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | South Sudan |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | South Sudan |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Aruba or South Sudan?
- Aruba, at 0 against 0 in South Sudan as of 1985.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Aruba and South Sudan?
- 0, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1985.
- How do Aruba and South Sudan rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Aruba ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.