Aruba vs Uganda: Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal
Aruba
0 tonnes per person
in 1985
Uganda
0 tonnes per person
in 2024
Aruba rank
141st
Uganda rank
141st
Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Aruba
- Uganda
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 tonnes per person.
Aruba ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions from coal, Aruba or Uganda?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Uganda as of 1985.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions from coal between Aruba and Uganda?
- 0 tonnes per person, with Aruba ahead.
- How do Aruba and Uganda rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions from coal?
- Aruba ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes per person.