Congo vs Suriname: Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal
Congo
0 tonnes per person
in 1958
Suriname
0 tonnes per person
in 2009
Congo rank
141st
Suriname rank
141st
Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 tonnes per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Suriname ahead.
Congo ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions from coal, Congo or Suriname?
- Congo, at 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Suriname as of 1958.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions from coal between Congo and Suriname?
- 0 tonnes per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1958.
- How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions from coal?
- Congo ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes per person.