Curacao vs Greenland: Per capita co2 coal
Curacao
0
in 2011
Greenland
0
in 1988
Curacao rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Curacao
- Greenland
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 against 0 in Greenland, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 3.16 | 3.16 | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 | 2.87 | 2.87 | Greenland |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.5447 | 0.5447 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.0397 | 0.0397 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Curacao or Greenland?
- Curacao, at 0 against 0 in Greenland as of 2011.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Curacao and Greenland?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Greenland?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1988.
- How do Curacao and Greenland rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Curacao ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.