Ecuador vs Greenland: Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal
Ecuador
0 tonnes per person
in 1960
Greenland
0 tonnes per person
in 1988
Ecuador rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Ecuador
- Greenland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Greenland, a difference of 0 tonnes per person.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0001 tonnes per person | 3.16 tonnes per person | 3.16 tonnes per person | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes per person | 3.76 tonnes per person | 3.76 tonnes per person | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions from coal, Ecuador or Greenland?
- Ecuador, at 0 tonnes per person against 0 tonnes per person in Greenland as of 1960.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions from coal between Ecuador and Greenland?
- 0 tonnes per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and Greenland rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions from coal?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes per person.