Ecuador vs St. Kitts and Nevis: Per capita co2 coal
Ecuador
0
in 1960
St. Kitts and Nevis
0
in 1980
Ecuador rank
141st
St. Kitts and Nevis rank
141st
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Ecuador
- St. Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in St. Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, St. Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 141st of 178 countries.
St. Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | St. Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0001 | 0.0237 | 0.0236 | St. Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Ecuador or St. Kitts and Nevis?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in St. Kitts and Nevis as of 1960.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Ecuador and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and St. Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and St. Kitts and Nevis rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 141st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.