Greenland vs Suriname: Per capita co2 coal
Greenland
0
in 1988
Suriname
0
in 2009
Greenland rank
141st
Suriname rank
141st
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Greenland
- Suriname
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 against 0 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.16 | 0.0139 | 3.14 | Greenland |
| 1960s | 2.87 | 0.0775 | 2.79 | Greenland |
| 1970s | 0.5447 | 0.216 | 0.3287 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 0.0715 | 0.1283 | 0.0567 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Greenland or Suriname?
- Greenland, at 0 against 0 in Suriname as of 1988.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Greenland and Suriname?
- 0, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1984.
- How do Greenland and Suriname rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Greenland ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.