Greenland vs Tunisia: Per capita co2 coal
Greenland
0
in 1988
Tunisia
0
in 2012
Greenland rank
141st
Tunisia rank
141st
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Greenland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 against 0 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.16 | 0.067 | 3.09 | Greenland |
| 1960s | 2.87 | 0.0405 | 2.83 | Greenland |
| 1970s | 0.5447 | 0.0558 | 0.4888 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 0.0397 | 0.0351 | 0.0046 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Greenland or Tunisia?
- Greenland, at 0 against 0 in Tunisia as of 1988.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Greenland and Tunisia?
- 0, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Tunisia?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1988.
- How do Greenland and Tunisia rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Greenland ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.