Mauritius vs New Zealand: Per capita co2 coal
Mauritius
1.26
in 2024
New Zealand
1.12
in 2024
Mauritius rank
36th
New Zealand rank
38th
Per capita co2 coal over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.26 against 1.12 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.14.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mauritius ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 178 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.1092 | 2.71 | 2.6 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0.0076 | 2.24 | 2.23 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.0033 | 1.62 | 1.62 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.0701 | 1.27 | 1.2 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.1483 | 1.29 | 1.14 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.7716 | 1.71 | 0.9369 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.28 | 1.2 | 0.0855 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1.23 | 0.9951 | 0.231 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 coal, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 1.26 against 1.12 in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 coal between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0.14, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for per capita co2 coal?
- Mauritius ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.