Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Per capita co2 including land

Equatorial Guinea
4.43
in 2024
Sweden
4.34
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
76th
Sweden rank
79th

Per capita co2 including land over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sweden
-10-50510185019372024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4.43 against 4.34 in Sweden, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sweden ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 76th and Sweden ranks 79th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1950s -5.08 5.77 10.85 Sweden
1960s -3.51 4.43 7.94 Sweden
1970s -4.76 7.89 12.66 Sweden
1980s -3.42 5.7 9.13 Sweden
1990s 1.1 5.81 4.71 Sweden
2000s 5.86 6.16 0.2939 Sweden
2010s 5.3 5.12 0.1778 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 4.86 4.38 0.4883 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita co2 including land, Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
Equatorial Guinea, at 4.43 against 4.34 in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita co2 including land between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
0.09, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for per capita co2 including land?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 76th and Sweden ranks 79th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 including land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Per capita co2 including land
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 20,897 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed