Georgia vs Sri Lanka: Per capita co2 including land
Georgia
1.35
in 2024
Sri Lanka
1.35
in 2024
Georgia rank
149th
Sri Lanka rank
150th
Per capita co2 including land over time
- Georgia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.35 against 1.35 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Georgia ranks 149th and Sri Lanka ranks 150th of 192 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -4.32 | 2.91 | 7.22 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | -3.7 | 4.74 | 8.44 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | -0.7302 | 1.83 | 2.56 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0.8909 | 0.9552 | 0.0643 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.0435 | 1.15 | 1.1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | -0.8143 | 1.86 | 2.68 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | -0.1705 | 1.72 | 1.89 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1.06 | 1.29 | 0.2325 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 including land, Georgia or Sri Lanka?
- Georgia, at 1.35 against 1.35 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 including land between Georgia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sri Lanka?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Sri Lanka rank globally for per capita co2 including land?
- Georgia ranks 149th and Sri Lanka ranks 150th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 including land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.