Mauritius vs Zambia: Per capita co2 including land
Mauritius
3.65
in 2024
Zambia
3.5
in 2024
Mauritius rank
96th
Zambia rank
99th
Per capita co2 including land over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3.65 against 3.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Zambia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 99th of 194 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.2099 | 23.83 | 23.62 | Zambia |
| 1960s | 0.3821 | 16.39 | 16.01 | Zambia |
| 1970s | 0.6823 | 10.23 | 9.55 | Zambia |
| 1980s | 0.7035 | 6.81 | 6.1 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 1.59 | 6.51 | 4.93 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 2.76 | 7.57 | 4.81 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 3.48 | 6.29 | 2.81 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 3.34 | 3.79 | 0.4416 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 including land, Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 3.65 against 3.5 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 including land between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 0.15, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for per capita co2 including land?
- Mauritius ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 99th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 including land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.