Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Per capita CO₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted
Sri Lanka
58.04 kilograms
in 2022
Uruguay
59 kilograms
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
47th
Uruguay rank
45th
Per capita CO₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 59 kilograms against 58.04 kilograms in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.96 kilograms.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 47th and Uruguay ranks 45th of 83 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 59 kilograms against 58.04 kilograms in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in per capita co₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0.96 kilograms, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for per capita co₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted?
- Sri Lanka ranks 47th and Uruguay ranks 45th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD (2025); UN Tourism (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita CO₂ emissions from international passenger flights, tourism-adjusted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
International aviation emissions are allocated to the country of departure, then adjusted for tourism.