Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Per capita co2 sector

Costa Rica
72.47
in 2023
Zimbabwe
69.15
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
123rd
Zimbabwe rank
125th

Per capita co2 sector over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
20406080100199020062023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 72.47 against 69.15 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.32.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 43.21 74.58 31.37 Zimbabwe
2000s 53.7 49.87 3.83 Costa Rica
2010s 57.48 42.19 15.29 Costa Rica
2020s 76.91 66.79 10.13 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita co2 sector, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Costa Rica, at 72.47 against 69.15 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita co2 sector between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
3.32, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for per capita co2 sector?
Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Per capita co2 sector
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
187 places, 6,310 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed