Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Per capita co2 transport
Cuba
140.65
in 2023
Zimbabwe
152.99
in 2023
Cuba rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
158th
Per capita co2 transport over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 152.99 against 140.65 in Cuba, a difference of 12.34.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 248.84 | 193.31 | 55.52 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 170.36 | 112.77 | 57.6 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 123.72 | 157.42 | 33.7 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 120.85 | 126.03 | 5.18 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita co2 transport, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 152.99 against 140.65 in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita co2 transport between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 12.34, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for per capita co2 transport?
- Cuba ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita co2 transport. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.