Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry

Hong Kong, China
5.24 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person
in 2024
Naoero
5.21 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
67th
Naoero rank
68th

Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Naoero
05101520185019372024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 5.24 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person against 5.21 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person in Naoero, a difference of 0.03 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 67th and Naoero ranks 68th of 198 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 14 and Naoero in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Naoero Difference Ahead
1850s 0.756 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0409 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.7151 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1860s 0.5296 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0454 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.4842 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1870s 0.4169 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0519 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.365 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1880s 0.3805 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0598 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.3206 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1890s 0.3282 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0681 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.2601 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1900s 0.2931 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.077 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.2161 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1910s 0.2609 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0846 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.1763 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1920s 0.2326 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0776 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.155 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1930s 0.2266 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0713 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.1553 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1940s 0.2312 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0805 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.1506 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1950s 1.08 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.0813 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.9949 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
1960s 1.93 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 4.24 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 2.31 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Naoero
1970s 3.16 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 13.69 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 10.53 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Naoero
1980s 4.99 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 16.26 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 11.27 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Naoero
1990s 6.08 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 10.96 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 4.88 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Naoero
2000s 6.69 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 6.03 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.6584 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 6.57 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 4.6 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 1.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 5.14 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 4.97 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person 0.1641 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry, Hong Kong, China or Naoero?
Hong Kong, China, at 5.24 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person against 5.21 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person in Naoero as of 2024.
What is the difference in per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry between Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
0.03 tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Naoero rank globally for per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry?
Hong Kong, China ranks 67th and Naoero ranks 68th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Jones et al. (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry. Statizoid, drawing on Jones et al. (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-ghg-excl-land-use/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-ghg-excl-land-use/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/">Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and forestry
Unit
tonnes of CO₂ equivalents per person
Source
Jones et al. (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 33,742 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured in tonnes per person of carbon dioxide-equivalents over a 100-year timescale.