Bhutan vs Serbia: Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions
Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions over time
- Bhutan
- Serbia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 121st and Serbia ranks 121st of 200 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pesticides manufacturing — emissions, Bhutan or Serbia?
- Bhutan, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pesticides manufacturing — emissions between Bhutan and Serbia?
- 0 kt, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Serbia rank globally for pesticides manufacturing — emissions?
- Bhutan ranks 121st and Serbia ranks 121st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf