Angola vs Armenia: Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions
Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions over time
- Angola
- Armenia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Armenia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Angola ranks 125th and Armenia ranks 125th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Armenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pesticides manufacturing — emissions, Angola or Armenia?
- Angola, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pesticides manufacturing — emissions between Angola and Armenia?
- 0 kt, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Armenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Armenia rank globally for pesticides manufacturing — emissions?
- Angola ranks 125th and Armenia ranks 125th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf