Mali vs Zimbabwe: Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions
Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 200 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pesticides manufacturing — emissions, Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Mali, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pesticides manufacturing — emissions between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for pesticides manufacturing — emissions?
- Mali ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pesticides Manufacturing — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf