What is the difference in population, total, per unit of gdp between Chad and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

0.0006 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population, total, per unit of GDP

Chad

0.001 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

0.0004 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chad rank

16th

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank

14th

Population, total, per unit of GDP over time

Chad
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.001 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 2.6 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

Chad ranks 16th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 14th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0085 units per US$ of GDP	0.01 units per US$ of GDP	0.0016 units per US$ of GDP	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1970s	0.0057 units per US$ of GDP	0.0065 units per US$ of GDP	0.0008 units per US$ of GDP	South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s	0.0049 units per US$ of GDP	0.0034 units per US$ of GDP	0.0015 units per US$ of GDP	Chad
1990s	0.0045 units per US$ of GDP	0.0028 units per US$ of GDP	0.0017 units per US$ of GDP	Chad
2000s	0.0027 units per US$ of GDP	0.0016 units per US$ of GDP	0.0011 units per US$ of GDP	Chad
2010s	0.0009 units per US$ of GDP	0.0006 units per US$ of GDP	0.0003 units per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0.001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0004 units per US$ of GDP	0.0006 units per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, total, per unit of gdp, Chad or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: Chad, at 0.001 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population, total, per unit of gdp between Chad and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chad and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for population, total, per unit of gdp?: Chad ranks 16th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 14th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Chad vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Population, total, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 262 places, 14,784 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 14 September 2026

Population, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.