East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Population, total, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zambia
0.0008 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
28th
Zambia rank
28th

Population, total, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.015196019922025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 8.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 28th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0113 units per US$ of GDP 0.0038 units per US$ of GDP 0.0075 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.006 units per US$ of GDP 0.0021 units per US$ of GDP 0.0039 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0023 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP 0.0025 units per US$ of GDP 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0017 units per US$ of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, total, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population, total, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zambia?
0.0007 units per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zambia?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zambia rank globally for population, total, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Zambia ranks 28th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zambia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zambia: Population, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, total, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 14,784 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.