East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Population, total, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan
0.0006 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th
Pakistan rank
33rd

Population, total, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Pakistan
00.0050.010.015196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 6.9 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Pakistan ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0111 units per US$ of GDP 0.0093 units per US$ of GDP 0.0018 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1970s 0.0059 units per US$ of GDP 0.0061 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1980s 0.003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0031 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1990s 0.0016 units per US$ of GDP 0.0024 units per US$ of GDP 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2000s 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP 0.0013 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2010s 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2020s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population, total, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population, total, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan?
0.0005 units per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan rank globally for population, total, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Population, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/population-total-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/pakistan/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Population, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population, total, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 14,784 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.