Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Ecuador
2 % change on previous year
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
1.89 % change on previous year
in 1991
Ecuador rank
61st
Yugoslav SFR rank
63rd

Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Yugoslav SFR
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2 % change on previous year against 1.89 % change on previous year in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.11 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 61st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 161 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Yugoslav SFR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 4.86 % change on previous year 1.03 % change on previous year 3.83 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s -3.48 % change on previous year -1.04 % change on previous year 2.44 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR
1980s 6.55 % change on previous year -0.3341 % change on previous year 6.89 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s -17.51 % change on previous year -0.2716 % change on previous year 17.24 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Yugoslav SFR?
Ecuador, at 2 % change on previous year against 1.89 % change on previous year in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR?
0.11 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Ecuador and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for potatoes — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 61st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/yugoslav-sfr/">Ecuador vs Yugoslav SFR: Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 10,375 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Potatoes — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.