Botswana vs Mauritania: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) over time
- Botswana
- Mauritania
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 170 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Botswana or Mauritania?
- Botswana, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Botswana and Mauritania?
- 0 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Mauritania rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
- Botswana ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).