Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square

Costa Rica
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
74th

Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Zimbabwe
000000196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square, Costa Rica or Zimbabwe?
Costa Rica, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square between Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Zimbabwe rank globally for potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 74th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/zimbabwe/">Costa Rica vs Zimbabwe: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,476 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.