Ecuador vs Finland: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
75th
Finland rank
72nd

Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Finland
000000196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 75th and Finland ranks 72nd of 137 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square, Ecuador or Finland?
Finland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square between Ecuador and Finland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for potatoes — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square?
Ecuador ranks 75th and Finland ranks 72nd of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Finland: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/finland/">Ecuador vs Finland: Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
139 places, 7,476 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.