Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Malawi: Potatoes — Crop residues (N content)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
68.91 million kg
in 2050
Malawi
12.20 million kg
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Malawi rank
14th

Potatoes — Crop residues (N content) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Malawi
020.0M40.0M60.0M196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 68.91 million kg against 12.20 million kg in Malawi, a difference of 56.71 million kg.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.7 times Malawi's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 14th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 6.20 million kg 307,037 kg 5.90 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 8.36 million kg 811,725 kg 7.54 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 10.37 million kg 1.15 million kg 9.22 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 24.86 million kg 2.34 million kg 22.52 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 42.05 million kg 6.12 million kg 35.93 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 49.68 million kg 5.13 million kg 44.55 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 51.55 million kg 3.09 million kg 48.46 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 57.24 million kg 9.11 million kg 48.13 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 68.91 million kg 12.20 million kg 56.71 million kg Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Malawi?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 68.91 million kg against 12.20 million kg in Malawi as of 2050.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malawi?
56.71 million kg, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malawi?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Malawi rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 14th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Malawi: Potatoes — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-n-content-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-n-content-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/malawi/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Malawi: Potatoes — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 11,587 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).