Cuba vs Togo: Pre- and post-production — Emissions
Pre- and post-production — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 40.69 kt against 39.93 kt in Togo, a difference of 0.76 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 118th and Togo ranks 120th of 256 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.04 kt | 31.62 kt | 62.42 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 93.03 kt | 34.33 kt | 58.7 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 93.44 kt | 37.4 kt | 56.04 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 63.24 kt | 39.46 kt | 23.78 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions, Cuba or Togo?
- Cuba, at 40.69 kt against 39.93 kt in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions between Cuba and Togo?
- 0.76 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 118th and Togo ranks 120th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf