Ecuador vs Sudan: Pre- and post-production — Emissions
Pre- and post-production — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 165.7 kt against 134.6 kt in Sudan, a difference of 31.1 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Sudan ranks 45th of 221 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 155.02 kt | 121.74 kt | 33.29 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 165.1 kt | 132.36 kt | 32.74 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 165.7 kt against 134.6 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 31.1 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 42nd and Sudan ranks 45th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf