Latin America and the Caribbean vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pre- and post-production — Emissions

Latin America and the Caribbean
7,619 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
344.62 kt
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
27th

Pre- and post-production — Emissions over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020062023

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 7,619 kt against 344.62 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 7,274 kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 22.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.

Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 6,011 kt 272.03 kt 5,739 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2000s 6,751 kt 295.03 kt 6,456 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2010s 7,625 kt 320.68 kt 7,305 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 7,617 kt 340.25 kt 7,277 kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions, Latin America and the Caribbean or United Republic of Tanzania?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 7,619 kt against 344.62 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions between Latin America and the Caribbean and United Republic of Tanzania?
7,274 kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions?
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pre- and post-production — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Latin America and the Caribbean vs United Republic of Tanzania: Pre- and post-production — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf