Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions, Cuba or Zimbabwe?

Zimbabwe, at 41.92 kt against 40.69 kt in Cuba as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4) (Pre- CH4)

Cuba

40.69 kt

in 2023

Zimbabwe

41.92 kt

in 2023

Cuba rank

109th

Zimbabwe rank

106th

Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4) (Pre- CH4) over time

Cuba
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 41.92 kt against 40.69 kt in Cuba, a difference of 1.23 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 248 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	94.04 kt	28.27 kt	65.77 kt	Cuba
2000s	93.03 kt	33.05 kt	59.99 kt	Cuba
2010s	93.44 kt	36.45 kt	57 kt	Cuba
2020s	63.24 kt	40.06 kt	23.18 kt	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions, Cuba or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 41.92 kt against 40.69 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions between Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 1.23 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions?: Cuba ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 248 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-ch4/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Pre- and post-production — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 283 places, 9,260 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.