Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
11,550 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
10,056 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
10th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
11th

Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 11,550 kt against 10,056 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 1,494 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th of 22 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 3 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 7,157 kt 6,183 kt 973.81 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 7,834 kt 8,434 kt 599.1 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 9,452 kt 8,882 kt 569.72 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 11,228 kt 9,935 kt 1,293 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq), Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 11,550 kt against 10,056 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
1,494 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq)?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 10th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf