Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
58,651 kt
in 2023
Poland
11,137 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
22nd
Poland rank
23rd

Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Poland
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 58,651 kt against 11,137 kt in Poland, a difference of 47,514 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.3 times Poland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 23rd of 33 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 33,388 kt 4,462 kt 28,926 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 44,834 kt 9,520 kt 35,314 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 53,069 kt 10,456 kt 42,613 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 57,619 kt 11,122 kt 46,497 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Poland?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 58,651 kt against 11,137 kt in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
47,514 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 23rd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/pre-and-post-production-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pre- and post-production — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf