Belarus vs Eswatini: Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share
Belarus
11.65 %
in 2023
Eswatini
11.44 %
in 2023
Belarus rank
116th
Eswatini rank
118th
Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 11.65 % against 11.44 % in Eswatini, a difference of 0.21 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 116th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 209 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.09 % | 7.76 % | 1.34 % | Belarus |
| 2000s | 12.33 % | 9.1 % | 3.23 % | Belarus |
| 2010s | 11.9 % | 11.16 % | 0.743 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | 11.63 % | 11.1 % | 0.5325 % | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions share, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 11.65 % against 11.44 % in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions share between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 0.21 %, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions share?
- Belarus ranks 116th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.