Ecuador vs Latvia: Pre- and post-production β Emissions Share
Ecuador
21.58 %
in 2023
Latvia
21.35 %
in 2023
Ecuador rank
64th
Latvia rank
67th
Pre- and post-production β Emissions Share over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.58 % against 21.35 % in Latvia, a difference of 0.23 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 67th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.49 % | 9.04 % | 8.44 % | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 18.1 % | 18.54 % | 0.433 % | Latvia |
| 2010s | 18.27 % | 20.38 % | 2.11 % | Latvia |
| 2020s | 21.13 % | 20.75 % | 0.3825 % | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pre- and post-production β emissions share, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 21.58 % against 21.35 % in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pre- and post-production β emissions share between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0.23 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for pre- and post-production β emissions share?
- Ecuador ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 67th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production β Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.