Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share
Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.13 % against 4.78 % in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.35 %.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th and Kazakhstan ranks 171st of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.31 % | 2.89 % | 0.4125 % | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.1 % | 4.74 % | 3.64 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1.76 % | 4.83 % | 3.07 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 3.7 % | 4.96 % | 1.27 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pre- and post-production — emissions share, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.13 % against 4.78 % in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in pre- and post-production — emissions share between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
- 0.35 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for pre- and post-production — emissions share?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th and Kazakhstan ranks 171st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pre- and post-production — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.